Rasmussen, L. A. (1999). Factors related to recidivism among juvenile sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 11, 69-85.
Hunter, J. A., Goodwin, D. W., & Becker, J. V. (1994). The relationship between phallometrically measured deviant sexual arousal and clinical characteristics in juvenile sexual offenders. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32, 533–538.
Hewitt, S.K. (1999). Assessing allegation of sexual abuse in preschool children: Understanding small voices. Interpersonal Violence: The Practice Series. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage
Hanson, R. K., & Howard, P. D. (2010). Individual confidence intervals do not inform decision-makers about the accuracy of risk assessment evaluations. Law and Human Behavior, 34, 275-281. doi:10.1007/s10979-010-9227-3
Grisso, T., & Vincent, G.M. (2005). The empirical limits of forensic mental health assessment. Law and Human Behavior, 29(1), 1-3. doi:10.1007/s10979-005-1396-0
Griffin, H. L., Beech, A., Print, B., Bradshaw, H., & Quayle, J. (2008). The development and initial testing of the AIM2 framework to assess risk and strengths in young people who sexually offend. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 14, 211-225.
Friedrich, W. N. (2002). Psychological assessment of sexually abused children and their families. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fanniff, A. M., & Becker, J. V. (2013). Adolescents adjudicated for sexual offenses. In D. S. Bromberg, W. T. O'Donohue, (Eds.), Handbook of child and adolescent sexuality: Developmental and forensic psychology (pp. 519-546). San Diego, CA, US: Elsevier Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-387759-8.00021-0
Fanniff, A. M., & Becker, J. V. (2006). Specialized assessment and treatment of adolescent sex offenders. Aggression And Violent Behavior, 11(3), 265-282. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2005.08.003
Elkovitch, N., Viljoen, J. Scalora, M. J., & Ullman, D. (2008). Assessing risk of reoffending in adolescents who have committed a sexual offense: The accuracy of clinical judgments after completion of risk assessment instruments. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 26, 511–528. doi:10.1002/bsl.832